So it looks like the Judge is on the hate campaign against Heather Mills aswell now. After being awarded 24.3 million in her highly publicised divorced with Sir Paul McCarntney, Heather’s joy was short-lived when she lost the battle to keep the details of the Judgement secret. See full judgement here.

Now we have all called Heather greedy for trying to get money out of Paul, for what was a relitively short marriage, but honestly who wouldn’t in her place? He has an astonishing £800m in the bank, so how does someone so rich, end up so bitter that he couldnt just pay off his wife, instead of dragging it through the courts, which his child is going to read about when she is older.It now also seems that Judge Sir Hugh, has also jumped onto the “Hate Heather” campaign. Claiming she was lying in court, and her evidence was ”incosistent and inaccurate”. The Judge also then goes onto praise Sir Paul for his honesty. Did the judge have these view before the court? Did that have any impact on his dicision? Who knows.

Now we all know Heather can go a little crazy with her rants, but does she really deserve all the hate against her?

[Source]